Functional MRI showing brain activity during perception of pain.
© SFB Treatment Expectation

Functional MRI showing brain activity during perception of pain.
© SFB Treatment Expectation

How do expectations change – and what influence do they have on pain and the treatment of pain?

Thoughts, experiences, and expectations can strengthen or weaken our experience of pain, and strongly influence how well pain treatment will work for an individual person. But what are the psychological and neuronal mechanisms underlying this effect? How, and for what reasons, do people’s expectations change? And what consequences does this have for the success of individual pain treatment? To find some answers to these questions, in Project A01, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to visualize study participants’ brain activity.

Negative expectations impact pain more strongly than positive expectations

In the first funding period of our Collaborative Research Centre, we have gained significant knowledge about how positive and negative expectations develop, how they are maintained, and how they change over time. The results so far suggest that negative expectations have stronger, and longer-lasting, effects on our experience of pain than positive expectations.

Another large controlled pharmacological trial showed that the dopaminergic system, with the neurotransmitter dopamine, is a key factor in the pain-inhibiting impact of placebo effects. And finally, we were able to identify certain brain regions whose interaction plays a role in the development of nocebo effects.

Focus on back pain, the noradrenergic system, and the ability to change expectations

In the second funding period, we would like to deepen this knowledge in Project A01 and extend it to investigations in patients with chronic back pain. In particular, we also want to look at the role of the noradrenergic system in changing expectations. The neurotransmitter noradrenaline is involved in the nervous system in the brain, and impacts, among other things, our emotions, sleep, attention, and learning processes. Additionally, we will focus on the dynamics and changes of expectations over time. For example, we will follow patients who are undergoing multimodal pain therapy over a longer period of time.

Bingel U, Wanigasekera V, Wiech K, Mhuircheartaigh R, Lee MC, Ploner M, Tracey I (2011) The effect of treatment expectation on drug efficacy: imaging the analgesic benefit of the opioid remifentanil. Science Transl Med 70. 70ra14. PubMed

Wrobel N, Wiech K, Forkmann K, Ritter C, Bingel U (2014) Haloperidol blocks dorsal striatum activity but not analgesia in a placebo paradigm. Cortex 57: 60-73. PubMed

Zunhammer M, Ploner M, Engelbrecht C, Bock J, Kessner SS, Bingel U (2017) The effects of treatment failure generalize across different routes of drug administration. Sci Transl Med 9(393) pii: eaal2999. PubMed

Zunhammer M, Bingel U, Wager TD; Placebo Imaging Consortium (2018) Placebo effects on the neurologic pain signature: A meta-analysis of individual participant functional magnetic resonance imaging data. JAMA Neurol 75(11):1321-1330. PubMed

In close cooperation with these projects

A02

A02

A03

A03

A04

A04

A06

A06

A13

A13

How can expectation effects help to reduce pain after a hip operation?

PD Dr. Regine Klinger
Prof. Dr. Sigrid Elsenbruch

A17

Project A17 – cerebellum and placebo effects – SFB/TRR 289 – Treatment Expectation

A18

A18

How are other people doing – and what does that mean for me?

PD Dr. Jan Haaker
Prof. Dr. Christiane Melzig

A19

A19

Project Lead

Prof. Dr. Ulrike Bingel

Prof. Dr. Ulrike Bingel
Neurologist, Neuroscientist

Team

Dr. Katharina Schmidt
Postdoc, Psychologist, Neuroscientist

Dr. Helena Hartmann
Postdoc, Psychologist, Neuroscientist

Dr. Belkis Ezgi Arikan
Postdoc, Psychologist, Neuroscientist

Dr. Livia Asan
Clinician Scientist, Resident in Neurology

Rebecca Lutz
PhD student

Vivien Janowicz
PhD student

Aoibhne Braunewell, Sam Völk, Hannah Gronewold
Medical students